By Offering a Novel test Case > 자유게시판

More than another area, the metaphysics of memory reflects the development in the direction of interdisciplinarity noted above, and MemoryWave Official work on this space generally shades into philosophy of psychology (Rowlands 2009) and philosophy of neuroscience (Bickle 2011). Relevant work in the philosophy of psychology is mentioned here as appropriate; for extra specialized work within the philosophy of neuroscience, see the entry on that subject. The central purpose of mainstream research on the metaphysics of memory is to develop a idea of remembering: a common however informative account of what it's for someone to remember one thing. As we are going to see, nevertheless, there are multiple sorts of memory. It is unclear whether or not it's possible to develop a theory of remembering that applies to all of these, and in the end it could show essential to develop a number of theories of remembering, corresponding to the a number of sorts of memory. 2002), philosophers have singled episodic memory out for special attention on the ground that it offers the rememberer with a singular type of entry to past events.

For some, certainly, solely episodic memory actually merits the name "memory" (Klein 2015; B. Russell 1921). Reflecting this focus, this entry will likely be concerned primarily with theories of episodic remembering: accounts of what it is for someone to remember an event from his personal past. Due, maybe, MemoryWave Official to their concentrate on episodic memory, philosophers have usually approached memory as a capacity exercised by single individuals. 1994; cf. Barash 2016; Michaelian & Sutton forthcoming) and which has recently given beginning to the multidisciplinary area of memory studies (Roediger & Wertsch 2008; Segesten & Wüstenberg forthcoming). It has also come to incorporate issues arising from the more recent tradition of analysis on exterior memory in cognitive science which views remembering by way of the lens of distributed (Hutchins 1995) or extended (Clark & Chalmers 1998) theories of cognition. Whereas the entry is anxious primarily with particular person memory, these more recent issues can be discussed as well.

Earlier than turning to theories of episodic remembering, it will likely be helpful to situate episodic memory with respect to other kinds of memory. In its broadest sense, "memory" refers to the numerous outcomes of the numerous types of learning of which humans and other brokers are succesful. Any modification of an agent’s behavioural tendencies as a result of its experience thus doubtlessly counts as memory, making the category of memory very broad indeed. Despite the breadth of the class, Memory Wave however, there is an approximate consensus on a taxonomy of sorts of human memory. Philosophers usually distinguish among three essential sorts of memory. 1911) and Russell (1921), for instance, distinguished between habit memory and recollective memory, while Broad (1925) and Furlong (1951) further distinguished between recollective memory and propositional memory (cf. Ayer (1956; D. Locke 1971)). These distinctions align fairly nicely with these drawn by a taxonomy which, originating in psychology, has more and more develop into commonplace in more recent philosophy.

The taxonomy in question, developed in detail by Squire (2009), divides the overarching class of memory into declarative and nondeclarative memory. Declarative memory, in turn, is divided into episodic memory, corresponding roughly to recollective memory, and semantic memory, corresponding roughly to propositional memory. A primary go at distinguishing episodic from semantic memory may be made by observing that the previous is anxious with the occasions of one’s personal previous specifically (e.g., I remember speaking at a convention in Budapest), whereas the later is anxious with the world in general (I remember that Budapest is the capital of Hungary). It is crucial to note, nevertheless, that semantic memory can also be sometimes involved with previous occasions. One can have memories that concern events that one didn't oneself expertise (I do not forget that my colleague spoke at a workshop in Rome, though I did not hear him speak); when one does, one remembers semantically, not episodically.