Theological Convergence and Division: Catholic-Orthodox Dogmatic Engagement > 자유게시판

For centuries, Catholic and https://asbest.name/forum/46-13289-1 Orthodox communities have grappled with profound doctrinal divides

Central to this divide is the nature of dogmatics: the authoritative doctrines that shape belief and practice

While both traditions share a deep reverence for the early Church Fathers and the decisions of the first seven ecumenical councils

they diverge significantly in their approaches to doctrinal development, transmission, and ecclesial reception

A fundamental distinction emerges in the understanding of papal authority

Catholic theology affirms the Pope’s supreme jurisdictional authority and his charism of infallibility when defining doctrine ex cathedra

The Orthodox Church, while acknowledging the historical honor of the See of Rome, rejects the idea of universal jurisdiction and papal infallibility, seeing these as later developments that lack apostolic foundation

The method by which dogmas gain authority deeply affects the lived faith of ordinary believers

In Catholicism, a solemn papal definition, in communion with the bishops, establishes a dogma universally binding

For Orthodoxy, truth is not decreed from a single throne but discerned communally, through the harmony of bishops, saints, and faithful across generations

A persistent theological flashpoint is the addition of the filioque to the Creed

The Catholic Church includes the phrase that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son

The Eastern Churches reject any alteration to the Nicene Creed’s original formulation of the Spirit’s eternal origin

This is not merely a linguistic or theological nuance; it reflects deeper differences in understanding the Trinity

Catholics regard the filioque as a theologically sound clarification that affirms the Son’s co-equality with the Father

Orthodoxy contends that the filioque distorts the Father’s unique role as sole source and was imposed unilaterally, undermining synodality

Over the past fifty years, ecumenical dialogues have increasingly emphasized mutual respect and careful discernment

Rather than demanding immediate agreement, participants have focused on clarifying terminology, studying historical context, and recognizing the legitimacy of each tradition's spiritual and theological heritage

More and more scholars acknowledge that "heresy" from one perspective may be "development" from another

Despite their divisions, both traditions confess identical fundamental doctrines, though articulated through distinct theological frameworks and ecclesiastical models

The path forward requires not only intellectual exchange but also spiritual conversion

Each community is summoned to hear the other not as adversaries but as kin in Christ, bound by one baptism and one apostolic calling

Doctrinal distinctions should never hinder unity but instead testify faithfully to the apostolic deposit

Dialogue does not mean abandoning one’s own tradition, but rather deepening one’s understanding of the faith through the perspective of the other

In this spirit, the reconciliation of dogmatic differences remains a long and prayerful journey, one that depends more on grace than on argument, and more on love than on logic