Articles For Creation/Redirects > 자유게시판

Please explain why this purpose couldn't be served by text alone. Text is obtainable underneath the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional phrases might apply. You may be better off obtaining proof of permission first. This may be for liquidkaufen a variety of causes, vapemod as an illustration as a result of it was created by the US Federal Government, ezigarettenzubehor or because it is simply too easy to attract any copyright.

It is too easy to be eligible for copyright. This typically applies solely to graphics that consist solely of straightforward geometric shapes and/or a few letters or words, or to gadgets equivalent to mathematical or chemical formulae. It was first printed in the US earlier than 1989, and its copyright expired as a result of it was revealed without a copyright discover and/or with out the required copyright registration.

It was created and e-zigarettevape first printed earlier than 1930 and is subsequently in the public Domain within the US. Specify date of demise, e-zigarettevape if applicable to public domain standing. Name the license or describe the general public domain status, vapeeliquids - www.vapeeliquids.de - adding any essential proof to make the licensing standing verifiable. For topics who lived in the early-to-mid twentieth century: have you ever thought-about if there could be an older photograph that has fallen in the general public area?

Whether it is in the general public area, you need to have the ability to point to an actual legislation that makes it so. Please present any evidence necessary to verify the general public area standing. This file would not seem to fall into both of the lessons above, or I'm not certain what its standing is.

This is a copyrighted work whose use doesn't fall into any of the classes above. Note: In the event you plan to use it for e-zigarettevape any other function than this, vapefrance (vapefrance.fr) please tick the box for "different non-free work" under.

If you plan to make use of the file for any goal aside from this, please don't use this section, but the one labelled "other kind of non-free work" under. I have learn the Wikipedia guidelines on Non-free content, and I'll explain how this file meets all of the criteria set out there. That is another form of non-free work that I believe is reliable Fair Use. In view of this, please clarify how using this file will probably be minimal. A normal honest use rationale will probably be added that matches any such use.

Clicking this button will redirect you to a page on Commons. State clearly, in your individual words, what this particular file can be doing in this specific article. The website must explicitly say that the picture is launched under a license that enables free re-use for any purpose, e.g. the Artistic Commons Attribution license. Typically, the illustration have to be used to support some particular challenge of debate in the article.

Will probably be included as that entity's primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article in question.

Please go away your feedback, feedback, bug experiences or recommendations on the talk web page.