A Search For a Way Do Clocks Work? > 자유게시판

The discussion is concerning the photograph or painting as such, as a creative work, not simply concerning the factor or particular person it exhibits. That is an excerpt from a copyrighted work, e.g. a screenshot from a film or Tv programme, a panel from a comic, or a sound pattern from a track. That is an excerpt from a copyrighted work. The article incorporates a dialogue of that work which requires illustration.

This can be a depiction of a copyrighted three-dimensional work or building, which is the object of debate in an article. For subjects who died recently: have you ever made an inexpensive effort to seek out people who may possess photographs of this individual and vapepremiumuk could be keen to launch one? I have learn the Wikipedia rules on Non-free content, and I will explain how this file meets all of the criteria set on the market. For subjects who lived in the early-to-mid 20th century: have you considered if there might be an older photograph that has fallen in the general public domain?

The image was created and published by the same creator who also holds the rights to the original object, and no different depiction may very well be suitably created. I discovered this file someplace, however I do not really know who made it or who owns it.

Please explain why a free alternative to this picture cannot be discovered. Please clarify why this goal could not be served with an alternate, free illustration that would yet be found or created.

Wikipedia, or is free besides that the free license excludes commercial use. Name the license or ezigarettepreis describe the general public area standing, vapegunstige including any vital evidence to make the licensing status verifiable. This file does not seem to fall into both of the classes above, or I'm not certain what its standing is. Your clarification should make it clear why the article could be significantly worse off without this file. This is a copyrighted artwork or vapehome photograph, vapepremiumuk and ezigarettenaromen the image itself is the subject of debate in the article.

The article as a complete is devoted particularly to a discussion of this specific photograph/painting. There may be a considerable amount of encyclopedic discussion of this work in this article. This isn't an actual encyclopedia article! Clicking this button will redirect you to a page on Commons. Please comply with the link and verify that the image description page has all the data you meant to incorporate.