Tungsten Rings Sucks. But You must Probably Know More About It Than That. > 자유게시판

본문 바로가기

Tungsten Rings Sucks. But You must Probably Know More About It Than Th…

페이지 정보

작성자 Neva Trumper 댓글 0건 조회 3회 작성일 25-11-18 02:23

본문

hq720.jpgTungsten mens rings as Wedding Bands: Pros, Cons, and Real Couples’ Stories
Jake, a firefighter, proposed with a $150 tungsten band. Three years later—zero scratches, despite dragging hoses and prying doors. "Gold would’ve been toast," he says. Emily, his bride, stacks a rose-gold tungsten eternity band. "We wanted rings as tough as our marriage."
Pros: scratch-proof, affordable ($100–$400 vs. $1,000+ platinum), hypoallergenic, permanent polish. Cons: non-resizable (weight fluctuations = new ring), heavy (some love, some hate), emergency removal requires cracking.
Sarah lost 60 lbs post-baby; her original tungsten spun like a hula hoop. Solution? Sold it on eBay for 70 % value, upgraded to a slimmer fit. "Still cheaper than resizing gold twice."
Military couples swear by tungsten—deployment-proof. One Marine’s ring survived an IED blast; only the silicone inlay melted. Replaced free under warranty.
Real talk: if you swell during pregnancy, size up or switch to silicone temporarily. Engrave post-ceremony if hands fluctuate.
Tungsten says "forever" without the fuss. Jake and Emily? Still shining.
tungsten wedding
tungsten inlay rings

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

충청북도 청주시 청원구 주중동 910 (주)애드파인더 하모니팩토리팀 301, 총괄감리팀 302, 전략기획팀 303
사업자등록번호 669-88-00845    이메일 adfinderbiz@gmail.com   통신판매업신고 제 2017-충북청주-1344호
대표 이상민    개인정보관리책임자 이경율
COPYRIGHTⒸ 2018 ADFINDER with HARMONYGROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

상단으로