How to Write Review of Literature in IGNOU Project > 자유게시판

In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of literature can be the most confusing component of their project. This is especially true for students working on an ignou MCOM project where academic rigor is expected, but the guidance appears to be limited. Students typically ask if they require a summation of their books, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not a document that demonstrates the amount of material you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the previous work that pertains to your subject and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU examiners examine the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is crucial to consider the reasons this chapter is needed in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three major purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the subject you have chosen has been previously studied and has a scholarly significance. Furthermore, it will help you determine the gaps or shortcomings in earlier studies. The third is that it creates the basis for your research objectives and methodological.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and copy content from their previous assignments or other online sources. This often results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. At the same time, very basic explanations are as well discouraged. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books report, journals, and sometimes even government publications related to your research area. The study should focus on topics which directly relate to the research area you are studying.

As an example, if the project focuses on the performance of financials of banks the literature review should be focused on previous studies that dealt with financial ratios, profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quality is more important than quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project roughly fifteen to twenty strong sources are usually enough as long as they're carefully chosen.

A good source is academic journals, reputed books by known writer, RBI publication, reports from the government, as well as university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research which are typically from the last 10 years. The older studies may be included only if they are fundamental in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve understanding and perception. Instead of writing random summaries and essays, you should divide sections of the review in clear sections.

You can structure the chapter by theme, time period method, variables, or methodologies examined. For instance, one chapter may discuss studies related to profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity and another regarding operational efficiency.

This format helps evaluaters understand that you're more than just copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be simple and academic. Avoid a lot of language and use of jargon. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Each study you analyze should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the purpose, method, and important findings. However, you shouldn't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try to connect one research to another.

For instance, when discussing the findings of one study, you could write about how a different author's research supported or refuted the findings. The comparative approach adds more greater depth to your project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like definition of accounting or meaning of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked to prior studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written in the style of your personal words. This shows your understanding. copying shows dependence.

They also fail to link sources to their own research area. Every study you mention should be in line with the objectives of your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main result of the study of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU assessment committees expect you expose what researchers of the past missed or indicate areas where further research is needed.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll notice that the majority of studies focused on large corporations but small companies were ignored. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, but primary data was not as extensive.

This void is the reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your program could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Every study to be discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. A text-based citation is more efficient and is more professional in an IGNOU MCOM project help (ladazap.ru) MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the writing review must last. There is no fixed rule that can be followed, however for an MCOM project, this chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should be determined by your topic's complexity. A broad topic will require additional research while a focussed topic requires less but more in-depth discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A analyzed banking performance and found good results

Write this way
Author A conducted a study of the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B, who emphasized the importance of operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank returns.

This method is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is considered important in an ignou MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. If you do refer to previous studies, the terminology ought to be uniquely yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom task, revisit the literature review thoroughly. Make sure that each study is relevant, if your flow follows logically, and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reason for why I need to study it. If yes it's on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature as part of an ignou master's thesis may be daunting at first particularly for those returning into academics after a time off. But once you recognize that it is more about connecting and analysis that memorization, the work becomes doable.

It is important to take time to read, think and write with your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected in the final work. It often can be the difference in being a weak submission and an average one. solid one.